Seeing the Whole Picture

In today’s complex world, boards need to be able to see interdependencies, anticipate ripple effects, and govern holistically. This article introduces systems thinking as a method for improving board oversight and long‑term impact.

When board directors sit around the table to make a key decision, the focus is often on the immediate problem or opportunity at hand. But in today’s complex business environment, decisions rarely exist in isolation. A new product launch might affect supply chain operations, regulatory compliance, brand reputation, and even organizational culture. A cost-cutting measure might boost short-term results but harm long-term competitiveness.

That’s where systems thinking comes in. It’s a mindset and methodology that helps directors see the big picture including how the components of an organization fit together, how they interact, and how changes in one area ripple throughout the whole system.

For boards, adopting a systems thinking approach can mean the difference between a well-intentioned decision that backfires and a strategic choice that delivers sustainable value. Let’s explore what systems thinking means for directors, why it matters, and how it can be applied in the boardroom.

Systems Thinking in a Boardroom Context

Systems thinking is about understanding the relationships, feedback loops, and interdependencies that exist within and around an organization. This approach moves beyond linear cause-and-effect thinking to recognize patterns over time, the influence of multiple variables, and the possibility of unintended consequences.

For the savvy director, systems thinking means viewing the organization as part of a larger ecosystem – its industry, community, regulatory environment, supply networks, and customer base. It’s about asking:

• How do different parts of the organization influence each other?
• What external factors could alter the effects of our decision?
• How might today’s decision set the stage for tomorrow’s challenges or opportunities?

Here’s an example. Suppose the board is considering expanding into a new international market. Systems thinking would prompt directors to examine not only the potential revenue but also the impact on operations, compliance requirements, cultural fit, staffing needs, and supply chain resilience.

Why Boards Need Systems Thinking

Boards are tasked with governing organizations in an environment that’s increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA). A narrow, compartmentalized view of issues can lead to oversights, inefficiencies, and overlooked risks. Systems thinking addresses these challenges by:

• Managing complexity. Many board decisions involve multiple interconnected factors – financial performance, stakeholder relationships, regulatory compliance, and social responsibility, to name a few. Systems thinking helps directors make sense of complexity by mapping relationships and identifying leverage points.
• Enhancing risk awareness. A decision in one area can create new risks in another. For instance, adopting a new technology might improve productivity but introduce cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Systems thinking ensures that these secondary and tertiary risks are considered.
• Aligning strategy across the organization. Silo thinking – that’s where departments or committees operate independently – can undermine strategic alignment. Systems thinking encourages directors to consider how a decision fits within the organization’s overall purpose and plan.
• Building future readiness. By understanding how systems behave over time, boards can better anticipate emerging trends, disruptions, and opportunities. This leads to decisions that are adaptive and resilient.

Before diving any further into systems thinking, let’s acknowledge our governing reality. Boards and their management teams face complexity every day. Strategy, risk, talent, technology, and culture are deeply interdependent. A decision in one area rarely stays in its lane.

Non-profits operate in a web of stakeholders: donors, beneficiaries, volunteers, regulators, and partners. A decision to cut administrative costs might please funders, but could strain staff, slow program delivery, and erode morale. A new partnership might expand reach but at the same time create compliance headaches or dilute brand identity.

For-profit boards face similar dynamics: policy changes, tech upgrades, or restructuring can ripple through customers, employees, and regulators. The principle is the same: every decision has intended and unintended consequences.

Two Quick Examples

1.  The Program Expansion Surprise

• Your non-profit board approves a new program to serve more beneficiaries. The intended outcome? Greater impact and stronger community presence.
• Unintended consequences: Staff capacity is stretched thin, volunteer burnout increases, and existing programs suffer. Meanwhile, fundraising needs spike, creating pressure on donor relationships.

Tip: A ripple scan (see below) could have flagged resource strain and prompted a phased implementation or additional funding strategies.

2.  The Office Recall

• A corporate board has decided to call employees back to the office full-time after years of remote work. The intended outcome? Improved collaboration, stronger culture, and better oversight.
• Unintended consequences: Employee morale dips, turnover rises, and talent acquisition suffers as flexibility disappears. Operational costs climb with space and utilities, while productivity gains are uneven.

Tip: Asking “What happens next?” and “What’s our trigger to revisit this?” could have led to a hybrid approach and retention safeguards.

Practical Tool – Ripple Effect Mapping, aka The Ripple Scan

There are a variety of visual tools to help facilitate understanding of the stakeholder systems impacted by board decisions. One useful, easy-to-use example is ripple effect mapping, or the ripple scan. It’s based on the concept that the consequences of every decision ripple outwards in unexpected ways.

The tool works like this. On a notepad, write the decision to be made in the center. Around it, list five words: strategy, risk, operations, people, culture. Under each word, note one possible upside and one possible downside.

For example, let’s consider the ripple scan for a decision about whether or not to approve a new fundraising event.

• Strategy. Upside: builds brand visibility. Downside: risk of mission drift.
• Risk. Upside: compliance with gaming laws. Downside: Reputational exposure.
• Operations. Upside: staff workload spikes. Downside: volunteer fatigue.
• People. Upside: boosts engagement. Downside: potential for burnout.
• Culture. Upside: energizes team. Downside: tension with existing programs.

This exercise takes five minutes and requires nothing but a pencil and paper, but it can spark a rich boardroom dialogue about the topic. Customize the ripple elements to whatever is appropriate for your board.

Benefits of Boards Using Systems Thinking

Better understanding of cause and effect. Systems thinking acknowledges that outcomes are rarely the result of a single cause. By exploring multiple contributing factors, directors can avoid oversimplified solutions that fail to address root causes.

Improved stakeholder engagement. By mapping out how different stakeholders are connected, boards can better appreciate the needs and concerns of employees, customers, regulators, investors, and the community.

Enhanced scenario planning. Systems thinking supports scenario planning by recognizing how different variables interact over time. This helps boards prepare for a range of possible futures.

Sustainable long-term impact. Decisions made with a systems lens are more likely to support long-term sustainability, avoiding quick fixes that create bigger problems later.

Stronger governance oversight. Systems thinking fosters integration across committees and functions, ensuring the board’s oversight role is informed by multiple perspectives.

Practical Ways Directors Can Apply Systems Thinking

In collaboration with management, savvy directors can use these simple, cost-effective methods to add value to the board’s discussion.

• Ask interconnection questions. At every decision point, ask, “How does this connect to other parts of the organization and its environment?”  to broaden the scope of analysis and help uncover ripple effects.
• Use visual tools. Tools such as causal loop diagrams, stakeholder maps, and system maps can make complex relationships visible and easier to discuss. (See the Resources section below for links.)
• Encourage cross-functional input. Request that management presentations include perspectives from multiple functions to help directors see how decisions affect the organization holistically.
• Monitor leading indicators. Lagging indicators (like financial results) show what has already happened, whereas leading indicators (such as customer satisfaction trends or employee engagement scores) can warn about future problems.
• Build systems thinking into board education. Include systems thinking concepts in director orientation and ongoing professional development. A board retreat is a great place to practice these skills.

Overcoming Challenges

While the benefits are clear, adopting a systems thinking approach isn’t without challenges like these:

• Resistance to change. Many directors are accustomed to linear problem-solving. Shifting to systems thinking requires a mindset change. Leadership from the board chair is essential. 
  Solution: Provide training and facilitated workshops to build comfort with the approach
• Limited meeting time. Deep analysis takes time, and board agendas are often packed.
  Solution: Use pre-meeting materials to provide systems maps or scenario outlines in advance, so directors arrive prepared to discuss interconnections.
• Data silos. When information is compartmentalized within departments or committees, it’s hard to see the whole picture. 
  Solution: Encourage management to improve information flows between functions and ensure board committees share insights regularly.

In Summary

In the boardroom, it’s tempting to zero in on the most urgent issue and solve it quickly. But organizations are complex systems, and board-level decisions can send ripples throughout that system. A change in one area can trigger shifts elsewhere, sometimes in unexpected – and unwelcome – ways.

By adopting a systems thinking approach, directors equip themselves to make more informed, sustainable, and strategically aligned decisions. They become better at anticipating challenges, engaging stakeholders, and ensuring that their organization thrives in a dynamic environment.

If you’re a director looking to sharpen your decision-making, start by asking systems-focused questions at your next board meeting. You’ll find that the answers can reveal connections and consequences you might otherwise miss – and that’s the kind of insight that leads to truly savvy governance.

Here are good questions to ask about systems thinking in board decision-making:

• What are the possible ripple effects of this decision across different parts of the organization?
• How does this decision align with our long-term strategy and values?
• Which stakeholders will be affected directly and indirectly, and how?
• What feedback loops could amplify or dampen the effects of this decision?
• How will we monitor early indicators of success or risk after implementation?

    Source: DirectorPrep’s ChatDPQ

 Your takeaways:

• Systems thinking helps boards move beyond a narrow focus on immediate issues to see the broader implications of decisions.
• It strengthens governance oversight by integrating perspectives from across the organization.
• It improves risk management by identifying secondary and tertiary risks.
• Visual and collaborative tools make systems thinking practical in board settings.
• Embedding systems thinking into board culture improves long-term resilience and strategic alignment.

Resources:

• From Experts to Architects – Why Boards Must Shift from Linear Expertise to Systems Thinking. Mark A. Pfister. Across the Board. December 2025.
• Why Being Different Makes You a Stronger Board Member. Kelli Richards. LinkedIn. November 2025.
• Integrative Thinking. © Roger L. Martin, Inc. (RLMI)
• A Comprehensive Guide to Stakeholder Mapping. Indeed Editorial Team. Indeed. March 2025.
• Systems Mapping. New Philanthropy Capital. © 2026 NPC.
• The Fifth Discipline: Systems thinking explained. Darya Sinusoid. Shortform Book Summaries. November 2022.
• The Power of Being T-Shaped: A Guide to Becoming an Exceptional Non-Executive Director. Emma Combe and Dee Symons. © 2025 Russell Reynolds Associates.

Thank you.

Scott

Scott Baldwin is a certified corporate director (ICD.D) and co-founder of DirectorPrep.com – an online membership with practical tools and valuable insights designed for board directors at every stage – from first appointment to seasoned board leader.

We Value Your Feedback: Share your suggestions for future Savvy Director topics.